There are many Christians who believe that
there will come a time when all men will be saved, regardless of whether
they believed in Christ in this life or not. They believe that those who did
not accept Christ will be raised for the great white throne judgment and given
another chance to accept Christ as their savior. And since the power of God
had been proven by the resurrection of the unbeliever who will stand at the
great white throne, it is assumed that all men will believe in Him Who raised
them from the dead.
In discussing this topic I will present several topics from the Bible which will greatly impact on the subject of universal salvation. These topics are:
I. The
Difference Between Universal Reconciliation And Universal Salvation
II. What Is Death?
III. Who Will Be Judged At The Great White Throne?
IV. The Resurrection Of The Unjust
V. Resurrection in the Old Testament
VI. Passages That Seem To Teach
Universal Salvation
II Cor. 5:18-19 makes it clear that the Bible
does indeed teach that the whole world is reconciled to God by the
shed blood of Christ on the cross. "All this is from God, Who reconciled us
to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that
God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting
men's sins against them…".Note that reconciliation is God acting
unilaterally, that is to say, reconciliation is unconditional, not in any
way dependent on anything that man may or may not do.
Consider also Col. 1:19-20,
For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to
reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in
heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross".
Let us go on in our study
and look at Romans 5:10 which also speaks of reconciliation..
"For if, when we were God's enemies,
we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much
more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his
life! "Note that Paul is making a distinction between reconciliation and
salvation. That is to say, he is saying that now that we have been reconciled
by Christ's death, then we may go on and be saved through His life.
Now let us consider Romans
10:9 where we read, "if thou shalt confess with they mouth the Lord Jesus
and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou
shalt be saved". This verse is speaking of salvation, not reconciliation,
and it is extremely important to note that salvation, unlike reconciliation
is given on condition that one confesses and believes.
Acts 16:30-31 is another
passage that explains the condition which must be met in order to be
saved, "..what must I do to be saved?
They replied, 'Believe in the Lord
Jesus, and you will be saved…".
One might ask, "As long as
an unbeliever's sins are not counted against him, why will he not be granted
resurrection life? The answer is that
resurrection life is a gift. It is a gift that is given to all who believe.
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever
believes in Him shall not perish, but have everlasting life."(John
3:16). Most Christians tend to believe
that it is sin that keeps the unbeliever from resurrection life. But
that is not what Scriptures teach. Sin
is not imputed, even to the unbeliever. But the gift of eternal life is not
given even to the unbeliever who, in God's sight, has no sin (because it is
not counted against him) because resurrection life is given only to those
who believe in His resurrected Son.
Another question we might ask is, if God does
not impute one's sin against him, why are there calls to repentance? In my
paper on this web-site, Repentance Is Not A Message
Of Salvation I give the reasons for my belief
that one is never called upon to repent in order to be saved from death. I
realize that this is not a widely held view, so I urge the reader to look
at the above- mentioned paper.
When God reconciled the world
to Himself He no longer counted men's sins against them. So
when a man dies, God does not count his sins against him whether that man accepted
Christ as his savior or not. Does that
mean that because no sins are counted against the unbeliever that the unbeliever
is saved? Absolutely not! Salvation is not unconditional, as is reconciliation;
salvation is based on the condition of belief in Christ.
One might ask, "If reconciliation
is not the same as salvation, what is it?". That question is answered
in the paper on this web-site, "Who Was
Reconciled To God By the Cross?".
II. WHAT IS DEATH?
Phil.
2:9 -11 is a passage that is often quoted to show that universal salvation
is a scriptural truth. It reads, "Therefore
God exalted Him to the highest place and gave Him the name that is above every
name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth
and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to
the glory of God the Father". Some
of those who espouse the doctrine of universal salvation point to this passage
and say that it includes even the dead. Our
topic therefore demands that we understand the scriptural description of death.
Let
us consider, for example, Psalm 49:13-15, "This is the fate of those who trust
in themselves,…..Like sheep they are
destined for the grave, and death will feed on them. The
upright will rule over them in the morning; their forms will decay in the
grave far from their princely mansions. But
God will redeem my soul from the grave; He will surely take me to Himself".
Note the contrast in this verse. The
forms will decay, but the writer of the Psalm will be redeemed. Without
redemption, i.e. resurrection, there is no life after death.
Job
8:13, "Such is the destiny of all who forget God; so perishes the hope of
the godless". Not only does the godless man perish, but this verse tells us
that his hope perishes as well.
Job
14:10, "But man dies and is laid low; he breathes his last and is no more".
Isaiah
26:14, "They are now dead, they live no more; those departed spirits
do not rise. You punished them and
brought them to ruin; you wiped out all memory of them".
It
is clear from these scriptures that apart from resurrection, man, when he
dies, is no more. If he is no more,
he can not have a second chance at salvation. (The
note in the Companion Bible suggest that Is. 26:14 refers to Rephaim, not
to the offspring of Adam. The paper on this web-site Were
The Rephaim Progeny Of Fallen Angles? will prove from scripture that they
were not. Therefore, Is. 26:14 is not limited, it applies to all unbelievers,
except for those of the tribulation.)
Jer. 51:39 and 57, "In their heat I will make their feasts and I will
make them drunken, that they may rejoice, and sleep a perpetual sleep,
and not wake, saith the Lord".
Mr.
A.E. Knoch, one of the main teachers of the universal salvation doctrine writes,
"The sinner is raised from the dead because he cannot be judged in the
death state. Once raised he
has tasted the power of God and sees the acts of his previous life in the
light of the divine presence". And
he also writes, "There can be no judgment in death. The resurrection of
the unjust is proof positive that there can be no judgment before the sinner
has been restored to life."
Mr. Knoch also writes, "It (the judgment of the unjust) is at
the great white throne in the interval between the resurrection and the second
death .We are dealing with the great mass of mankind."
It is clear that the
key issue to universal salvation is that all unbelievers will be raised
and judged at the great white throne. It is with this issue that, in my
opinion, the doctrine of universal salvation totally fails. We have already
seen that there are at least six passages that tell us that some will not
be raised for judgment or anything else. We will study this issue in the next
section of this paper.
III. WHO WILL BE JUDGED AT THE GREAT WHITE THRONE?
It has long been taught that all unbelievers of every dispensation will be judged at the great white throne. Let us consider this by searching the scriptures.
The great white throne is mentioned by name only in Revelation. The book of Revelation is centered on the tribulation. This fact connects the great white throne with the tribulation.
Rev. 20:11- 12 gives us further insight as to
the great white throne judgment and reads, "Then I saw a great white throne
and Him who was seated on it.….books
were opened. Another book was opened,
which is the book of life. The dead were
judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books".
Note that these people at the
great white throne were judged by what they had done. But man has always
been saved by grace through faith in every dispensation. In
Rom. 4:3 Paul quotes Gen. 15:6 when he writes, "Abraham believed God
and it was credited to him as righteousness". And in the next verses
Paul writes, "Now when a man works his wages are not credited to him as a gift,
but as an obligation. However, to the
man who does not work but trusts God, ….his faith is credited to him
as righteousness" (Rom. 4:4-5).
Abraham
lived before the dispensation of Law. But
we know that salvation was by grace through faith for the entire dispensation
of Law, as well as before it, because in the next verse Paul writes that, "David
says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the man
to whom God credits righteousness apart from works. So
Paul, in verse 5 tells us that for the man who trusts God, his faith is credited
as righteousness. And then, by the Holy
Spirit tells us that David says the same thing. We
must conclude that those who lived in the dispensation of Law, as well as every
other dispensation, are saved by grace through faith.
We might ask ourselves why, out of all the
times of history, are the unbelievers of the tribulation raised to be judged
for what they have done, when the Bible is clear that salvation is by grace
through faith? I believe that the answer
lies in Rev. 3:10 where we read that the time of testing will come
upon the inhabited world to test Israel.
What is the tribulation all
about? It is about Satan, with the
antichrist as his agent "pulling out all the stops", so to speak, to try to
get Israel, God’s chosen people, to forsake God and worship Satan. The
very first commandment that God gave to His chosen people (Thou shalt have no
other gods before Me) tells us how He would feel about them worshipping Satan.
While it is true that Israel worshipped
idols throughout much of their Old Testament history, there is no record of
them ever having worshipped God’s arch- enemy, Satan.
I believe that the tribulation
will be a very special time when those who are to be tested will have to choose
between remaining true to the God of heaven and earth, or worshipping Satan.
Those who remain true to God and refuse to worship the antichrist, or to receive
the mark of the beast, may lose their lives, but they will partake in the
first resurrection and will live and reign with Him. Those
who do receive the mark of the beast and who do
worship the antichrist may save their temporal lives but will be judged
at the great white throne, and are in danger of suffering the second death,
i.e. being cast into the lake of fire.
The fact that those who were
judged at the great white throne by what they had done should make
us, at least, consider the question as to who was judged
and why they were judged by what they had done?
For the answer to those questions let us back up a little to Rev. 20: 4-6."….And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshipped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. "This tells us that John is speaking of those who went through the great tribulation, he is not speaking of every person that ever lived from the beginning of time. Let us go on with verse 4, "They (i.e. those who had not worshipped the beast during the great tribulation) came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. "We read in this portion of the verse of the reward for those who did not worship the beast, i.e. that they will reign with Christ during His millennial reign. Now let us go to verse 5,"(The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.)"To say that the "rest of the dead" in this verse applies to the dead of all ages is to take this phrase entirely out of context. The context is clearly contrasting those who did not receive the mark of the beast during the tribulation with those who did. The former will reign with Christ in His millennial reign, the latter will be raised after the millennial reign to be judged. But in both cases, those who did and those who did not receive the mark of the beast, were those who lived through the tribulation. It is clear that we must take the phrase "the rest of the dead" in its context in order to have a correct understanding of who "the rest of the dead" were.
Let me put
this concept in terms of every day life. If
we, for example, went to a dog show, we might see that after the first round
of judging some dogs were allowed to leave, but others were being kept. One
of the judges might dismiss some dogs, but ask the rest of the dogs to
go to a different room for further testing. When the judge asked the rest
of the dogs to go to a different room, he did not have in mind the rest of
the dogs in the whole world, but the rest of the dogs that were left
in the competition.
So when John writes of the "rest of the dead",
he is not referring to the rest of the dead that ever lived, he is referring
to the rest of the dead who lived through the tribulation. The
tribulation is what Revelation is about; we must take things in their contexts.
Let us look again at Rev.
20:5 where we read, "The rest of the dead did not come to life until
the thousand years were ended". The
word "loipos" is the Greek word translated here "rest". It
occurs 42 times and is translated "other(s)" 24 times;" rest" 12 times;
"remnant" 4 times and "residue" and "remains" one time each.
One of the verses which translates
"loipos" as "other" is II Cor. 12:13, "How were you inferior to the other
churches, except that I was never a burden to you? "Did
Paul mean all the churches of the world, including all the false religions
of the world, or only Christian churches? The
answer is obvious, we must consider "other" in its context.
Consider also Gal. 2:13,
"The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy…". The context will
show that the hypocrisy was that believing Jews refused to eat with Gentiles.
Unbelieving Jews would not even have considered such a thing as they considered
it against the Mosaic Law. So by not
eating with Gentiles, unbelieving Jews would have been living in ignorance,
not hypocrisy. Again, we must consider
"other" in the context or we will certainly be led astray in our seeking for
the truth. In this case "other" refers
to believing Jews, not to all the Jews in the world, including unbelieving
Jews.
If "loipos" had been translated
"others" in Rev. 20:5 (as it had been in the 24 of the 42 occurrences of the
Greek) there would have been no difficulty with the question of who would
be judged at the great white throne."….I
saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for
Jesus and because of the word of God. They
had not worshipped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on
their foreheads or their hands. They
came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.(The
others did not come to life until the thousand years
were ended)."
The translators chose "rest"
instead of "others", but "others" is certainly more accurate. That is to say,
that if Rev. 20:5 had been translated in the same way as the majority of the
other occurrences of "loipos", we would have understood that the "others"
referred to in verse 5 are those who did worship the beast.
Some
might say that while it is true that most of the Revelation has to do with
tribulation times, the scope of the book changes when we get to the great
white throne in chapter 20. Let us examine that thought. In Rev. 2:7 we read
for the first time of overcoming. "….To him who overcomes, I
will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise
of God". The paradise of God, is, of
course described in Rev. 21 and we read in verse 7 of that chapter, "He who
overcomes will inherit all this…". Chapter two promises the
overcomers of the tribulation life in the "paradise of God", and chapter
21 describes that paradise and promises it once again to the overcomes.
Because the promise made in chapter 2 is made to the overcomers of
the tribulation, and that promise is referred to in chapter 21, it is
obvious, in my opinion, that the scope of Revelation does not change from
chapter 2 to chapter 21. The entire book centers on the tribulation and the
reward or judgment of those who lived and/or died during it.
Going back again to chapter
two of Revelation, we read in verse 11, "He who overcomes will
not be hurt at all by the second death". The
second death is explained in Rev. 20:14, "The second death is the lake of
fire". The same promise is made in chapter two concerning the second death
as is made again in chapter 20."Blessed
and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The
second death has no power over them…"(Rev.
20:6).Again, the same promise
is made to the same people (the overcomers) in chapter two as is made
in chapter 20. This, once again, shows that the scope of Revelation does not
change from the beginning of the book to the end of the book.
We have seen by comparing the earlier chapters
of Revelation with the last chapters of Revelation that the scope of the book
does not change at all. The entire
book has to do with the tribulation and the reward or punishment given to
those who lived through it. Therefore, when we read in chapter 20 of the great
white throne, we should not read into God's Word that which is not intended.
That is to say, we may not include all of humanity from every dispensation,
when the entire book centers on a three and one-half year time period. (In
another paper on this site, I give the reasons for my belief that the tribulation
is not world wide, this limits the Revelation not only in the length of time,
but also its geographical area. Please see The Tribulation
Is Not Worldwide).
Some might object to the fairness of some unbelievers, i.e. those that live
during the tribulation period and in the day of God's wrath, being subject
to judgment and the punishment of the second death, while most unbelievers
will not be. Let us examine that objection.
While it is true in my opinion, that unbelievers of the end times are subject
to punishment that unbelievers of other dispensations are not, it is also
true that they will be the beneficiaries of many special signs and ministries
of God. For example, Matthew 24:4-29 is a record of the signs of the end times
given by our Lord to His disciples so that they might recognize them when
the end comes. These signs are recorded for all who seek the truth concerning
those days, and should prove to all who read it that God is the One true God.
Note verse 5 where we are warned that false prophets will come and deceive
many. Verse 15, "So when you see standing in the holy place the abomination
that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel-let the reader
understand- then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains". What further
sign that the end times have arrived could anyone possibly want then an idol
placed in God's holy temple? And how could even the unbeliever not be convinced
that God is Who He says He is when he is a witness to the fulfillment of prophecy
in his own time.
As if that were not enough, we read in Rev. 11:3 of two witnesses, "And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth". We read in verse 5 of these two witnesses and the absolute proof of their being sent from God. "If anyone tries to harm them, fire comes from their mouths and devours their enemies".
And as if that were not enough, let us consider Rev. 14:6-7, "Then I saw another angel flying in midair, and he had the eternal gospel to proclaim to those who live on the earth-to every nation, tribe, language and people. He said in a loud voice, 'Fear God and give him glory, because the hour of His judgment has come". What could possibly be more convincing?
Yes, I believe that it is true that some unbelievers (those of the tribulation period and the day of God's wrath) will be judged and punished whereas other unbelievers will not be. But those who will be judged and punished are given more advantages in hearing the truth than in other dispensations and will therefore, be without excuse.
In summary then,
I am suggesting that because
the entire book of Revelation is limited as to the time period, I believe
that only the unbelievers who went through the tribulation will be raised
and judged at the great white throne, not all unbelievers from every dispensation.
For the reasons given above, I believe that we may conclude that
the great white throne judgment is not a judgment of all the dead who ever
lived. Rather, it is limited to those who lived through the tribulation
and did worship the antichrist and who did receive the mark of the beast.
Therefore, we have no scriptural evidence of a general resurrection of all
unbelievers and consequently, no second chance for salvation. With no second
chance to accept Christ as savior, the unbelievers remain in their graves,
and there is no universal salvation.
There
are a few passages that do speak of the resurrection of the unjust. Do
those passages speak of mankind in general? Let
us examine the scriptures for an answer to that question.
IV. PASSAGES THAT SPEAK OF THE RESURRECTION OF THE UNJUST DANIEL 12:1-2
Daniel 12:1-2 is a passage that speaks of the resurrection and judgment of the unjust. "At that time Michael, the great prince who protects your people, will arise. There will be a time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until then. But at that time your people, everyone whose name is written in the book of life, will be delivered. Multitudes who sleep in the dust will awake, some to everlasting life and others to shame and everlasting contempt. " How are we to understand this passage, who does it concern, when will this judgment take place? Some of these questions are answered in the passage itself. Note for example, the phrase "your people" appears twice. That tells us that this passage is about Daniel’s people, Israel. What is the time that is spoken of in this passage? We are told that it is about the time of the greatest distress, i.e. the great tribulation. This makes sense; the tribulation is to be centered on Israel, Daniel’s people.
We read of those whose name is written in the book of life. While it is true that believers of the dispensation of the mystery have their names written in the book of life, I believe that to make Daniel 12:1-2 apply to believers of all dispensations is take the phrase "book of life" in Daniel out of context and force a meaning that the context will not allow. The context is about Israel and the tribulation, not about everyone who ever lived in the whole world.
To summarize what we have learned of this passage: The resurrection of Daniel 12 includes the unjust, but limits that resurrection in time and scope. It limits the resurrection to the time of the tribulation and to the people of Israel. Again, we may not, in my opinion, include all unbelievers in this passage, as the Holy Spirit was specific in the description of the time and the scope of this resurrection. The phrase, "Multitudes who sleep in the dust will awake, some to everlasting life and others to shame…" is similar to the one in John 5 and will be discussed in the next section of this paper.
There are several passages
in the New Testament about judgment. We will look only at those passages that
speak of resurrection and judgment of the unjust as those are the only
passages that impact on our study.
JOHN 5:24-29
Other than the passage in Revelation 20 about the great white throne judgment, there are only two passages in the New Testament that mention a resurrection and judgment of the unjust. The first one is in John 5:24-29. John 5:24-25 reads, "I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life. I tell you the truth, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of Man, and those who hear will live."
But then, in verses 28-29
our Lord says, "Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when
all who are in their graves will hear His voice and come
out – those who have done good will rise to live and those who have done evil
will rise to be condemned".
In verse 25 "the dead will
hear the voice of the Son of Man and those who hear will live".
But in verses 28-29 we are told that all in the graves will hear
His voice and come out but not all will live. "Those
who have done evil will rise to be condemned".
There
seems to be a contradiction in this passage. That is to say, in verse 25 our
Lord says those in their graves who hear His voice will live. But
in verses 28 and 29 He says that some of those in the grave who hear
His voice will not live but be condemned.(While
it is true that the word "judgment" is a better translation of the Greek than
"condemned", it does not change the meaning of the passage, as it involves judgment
of the wicked.)
The key to understanding this passage is to
note that both statements begin with "A time is coming". I
believe that the only way we can understand this passage and to answer the
seeming contradiction, is to recognize the fact that there are two resurrections
mentioned, and they occur at two different times. The first one mentioned
is for the believer who will not be judged but has passed from
death to life; the second resurrection mentioned is for those who will
be judged.
Let us examine each resurrection for the scriptural
evidence, which will tell us when these two resurrections will take place.
In verse 24 we read of those
who "believe" and have therefore, "crossed over from death to life". I
believe that this resurrection points us to I Thess. 4:16 where we read of the
second coming of our Lord when "the dead in Christ will rise …".The
resurrection of verses 24-26 then, refers to the resurrection at the second
coming, i.e. at the beginning of the millennial reign.
When will the resurrection
of verses 28-29 occur? We are not told
explicitly when, but we are told something of the character of the judgment
of those who are resurrected. We read in verse 29 that they will be judged
according to what they have done, "those who have done good will rise
to live, and those who have done evil will rise to be condemned". This
seems to be salvation by works!
As we learned from the section
above on the great white throne, salvation has always been by grace through
faith. Nowhere but here, in John five,
and in Revelation 20 do we read of the resurrection of the unbeliever in order
to be judged according to their works.
Because
the only two passages that speak of a resurrection to judgment by works occurs
in John 5:28-29 and in Rev. 20 at the great white throne, I believe that we
may conclude both passages speak of the same event, the great white throne judgment.
It is after the millennial
reign, so the resurrection of John five verses 28-29 refers to the one after
the millennial reign.
Just as the first resurrection
mentioned in Rev. 20:6 is for those who were resurrected before the
millennial reign, so the first mention of a resurrection in John 5 ( i.e. verses
25-27) is before the millennial reign. So
also, just as the second resurrection of Rev. 20:11-14 will be for those who
will be raised for judgment after the millennial reign, so those
in John 5:28-29 will be raised for judgment after the millennial
reign. The judgment that occurs after the millennial reign is at the
great white throne.
We have a complete and beautiful symmetry between John 5 and Rev.
20.
As we discussed in the paragraphs above, the
resurrection of Rev. 20 at the great white throne is limited to those who
received the mark of the beast during the tribulation, so also, is the resurrection
of John 5:28-29 limited to those who received the mark of the beast.
Let me summarize what has been
written here concerning John 5. John 5:24-27 speaks of the resurrection of believers;
they will be raised before the millennial reign of Christ, and they will
not be judged. The resurrection
of verses 28-29, on the other hand, will be after the millennial
reign of Christ and they will be judged. By comparing John 5:28-29 with
Rev. 20 we see that the resurrection of John 5:28-29 will lead to the judgment
at the great white throne.
ACTS 24:14-15
Another passage having to do with the resurrection
of the unjust is found in Acts 24:14:15. Paul writes, "…. I believe everything
that agrees with the Law and that which is written in the Prophets, and I
have the same hope in God as these men, that there will be a resurrection
of both the righteous and the wicked". Note
Paul’s reference to the Law and the Prophets. The
only reference I can find by the Old Testament prophets to the resurrection
of the wicked is Daniel 12:1-2. That scripture has been discussed above.
As we have seen, it refers to the great
white throne judgment, a judgment of those who lived through the tribulation.
V. Resurrection in the Old Testament
Other than the picture of the resurrection of our Lord given
by the experience of Jonas in the belly of the leviathan, I can find only
two scriptures in the Old Testament which refer to resurrection. (It is therefore
perhaps understandable why some who lived while our Lord was on earth did
not believe in resurrection.) One of those passages is in Daniel 12,
which we have already discussed. The other is in Ezek. 37:12-14. This
passage speaks of the resurrection of Israel. We read in verse 11, "Then
he said to me: Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. ….Therefore
prophesy and say to them: This is what the Sovereign Lord says: ‘O My people,
I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them". If we take
the phrase, the "whole house of Israel" out of context we may be
drawn to the erroneous conclusion that it refers to the unfaithful as well
as the faithful. But let us continue with the very next phrase, where
we read, "I will bring you back to the land of Israel".
This phrase is important in that it tells us that those who will be resurrected
will be brought into the land promised by God to Abraham. But as we
shall see as we continue in our study, only believers will be allowed in
the land for the millennial reign of Christ. That is to say, resurrection
is promised to only those of Israel who will be allowed into the land for
the millennium, i.e. only believers. Unbelievers will not be allowed
entrance and they will not be resurrected. (The exception in terms of
resurrection is, of course, those unbelievers of Israel who worship the beast
during the tribulation.) As we continue, we will see that God purges His people
of unbelievers, they will not be allowed entrance into the kingdom of Heaven.
This purging is of those of Israel who will be alive at His coming, there
is no hint of resurrection in these passages.
We read in Matthew 8:11-12, "I say to you that many will come from the
east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac
and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. But the subjects of the kingdom
will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping
and gnashing of teeth".
The "subjects of the kingdom" of verse 12 refers to Israel.
The phrase "kingdom of heaven" is limited in scope, and refers to
Christ’s 1,000 year reign over Israel in the land. Those "thrown out"
of the kingdom of heaven will be thrown out of the land of Israel to live
in the Gentile nations. (For proof of these statements please see the paper
on this web-site The Kingdom of Heaven.)
Matthew 13:37-43 includes the explanation of the parable of the weeds and
the prophecy which completes it. Verse 38b, "the weeds are
the sons of the evil one". Verse 39b, "The harvest is at the
end of the age". Verse 41, "The Son of Man will send out His angels,
and they will weed out of His kingdom everything that causes sin and
all who do evil". What will happen to those being weeded out?
Verse 42, They will be thrown into the fiery furnace…" (that is, outside
the land of Israel, while those in the land will be enjoying millennial blessings.
The "weeding out" of this parable is what Ezekiel refers to in
20:35-38. "I will bring you into the desert of the nations and there,
face to face I will execute judgment upon you. As I judged your fathers
in the desert of the land of Egypt, so I will judge you, declares the Sovereign
Lord. I will take note of you as you pass under my staff, and I will
bring you into the bond of the covenant. I will purge you of
those who revolt and rebel against me. Although I will bring them out
of the land where they are living, yet they will not enter the land of
Israel….".
A word of clarification of Ezek. 20:40 is in order. The NIV has, "…..the
entire house of Israel will serve me there". That would suggest
that all Israel, including unbelievers will be allowed into the land.
But the Hebrew-English Interlinear has, "The entire house of Israel,
all of them in the land will serve me there". The KJV also includes
this phrase. This is consistent with all the other scriptures that concern
the gathering of Israel for the millennial blessings, i.e. only the faithful
are allowed into the land and therefore, only the faithful will serve Him
there.
In order not to create any confusion, we should consider Ezek 36 in this
discussion of who is allowed entrance into the land. Ezek. 36:24-27, "For
I will take you out of the nations; I will gather you from all the countries
and bring you back into your own land. ……..You will live in the land I
gave your forefathers, you will be my people and I will be your God".
Here we read that Israel will be in the land, but in Ezek. 20 we read
that some would not be allowed entrance into the land. Let us consider this
apparent contradiction.
We have seen in two passages in Matthew (and there are several more) that
some of Israel will be "thrown out" of the land; they will not be
allowed entrance into the kingdom of Heaven. We have also seen in Ezek. 20
that the unfaithful will be brought out from where they had been scattered,
but they will not be allowed entrance into the land. We must conclude therefore,
that the promises of Ezek. 37 are not given to unfaithful Israel, they are
given to faithful Israel only. If we do not recognize that truth we
are faced with the unthinkable conclusion that there is a contradiction in
God’s perfect Word. They are not all Israel that of Israel and the faithful
will be cut off from their people and will not be counted as Israel.
(See Rom. 11:17a and 23.)
Let us also consider the following scriptures that tell us that only the
faithful of Israel will enter the land.
Psalms 37:9, "For evil men will be cut off, but those who hope in the
Lord will inherit the land".
Ps. 37:22, "those the Lord blesses will inherit the land, but those He
curses will be cut off".
Ps. 37:34, "Wait for the Lord and keep his way. He will exalt you
to possess the land; when the wicked are cut off, you will see it."
Prov. 2:21-22, "but the wicked will be cut off from the land, and the
unfaithful will be torn from it."
We are now ready to draw some conclusions about who will be included in the
resurrection of Ezekiel 37. Because the resurrected of Ezek. 37 will
be in the land for the millennial reign, we must conclude that they are believers,
as unbelievers are not allowed entrance. That is to say, the unbeliever
is not included in the resurrection of Ezek. 37. There are therefore,
no scriptures, other than Revelation 20 (great white throne) that speak of
the resurrection of unbelievers.
If unbelievers of Israel will not not be raised, and I believe they will
not be, then they will not inherit resurrection life. Therefore, there is
at least one company that can not be included in a "universal salvation".
In my opinion, therefore, this is one more piece of evidence from scripture
that universal salvation is not taught in God's Word.
VI.
PASSAGES THAT SEEM TO TEACH UNIVERSAL SALVATION
PSALM 22:27-29
"All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the Lord; and all the families of the nations will bow down before him. For dominion belongs to the Lord and he rules over the nations. All the rich of the earth will feast and worship; all who go down to the dust will kneel before him- those who cannot keep themselves alive". The phrase, "all who go down to the dust will kneel before him" suggests to those who believe in universal salvation, that all will be resurrected in order to worship. There are however, two things wrong with that conclusion.
1) This is obviously a Psalm which looks forward to the millennial reign for its fulfillment. Note the phrases, "nations will bow down before him", and "he rules over the nations". But the only resurrection that the Bible mentions as taking place before the millennium is of those in Christ, i.e. believers (see I Thess. 4:16).Some unbelievers will be raised to be judged at the great white throne, but that is not until after the millennial reign, (see Rev. 20:5).
2) The NIV Hebrew Interlinear
has literally, "all of one going down of dust". In
other words, "all who are dying". That
explains the phrase "those who cannot keep themselves alive". Therefore, I
believe that we must conclude that because there is no resurrection of the
unbeliever until after the millennial reign, that this passage does
not refer to those who have already died and will be resurrected, but to all
that are alive, but dying.
JOHN 12:32
"But
I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." It
is abundantly evident that our Lord has not "drawn all men" to Himself. Therefore,
if "all men" means everyone who ever lived, a resurrection of unbelievers is
a necessity. But, apart from the resurrection of those who lived in the time
of the tribulation and will be raised for the judgment at the great white throne,
there is no resurrection of unbelievers. How then are we to understand
Christ's statement that he would draw all men to Himself?
The
key to understanding John 12:32 is in John 6, verses 37, 39 and 44."All
that the Father gives me will come to me…" (John 6:37)."And
this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that
he has given me."(John 6:39)."No
one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him". (John 6:44).
There is, of course, no contradiction between
Christ saying that He will draw all men to Himself and the plain fact that
not all men have been drawn to Him. Christ will draw all men that the Father
has given Him. Some men will die before they have accepted the free gift
of salvation. Because there is no universal resurrection of the unbeliever
spoken of in the Bible, those unbelievers will never be drawn to Christ.
ROMANS 5:18-19
(Vs.
18), "For if by one man's offense death reigned by one; much more they which
receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall
reign in life by One. (vs. 19) Therefore as by the offense of one, judgment
came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of One, the
free gift came upon all men unto justification of life".
To
those who believe in universal salvation, this passage teaches that the "free
gift" was given to all men. What is the gift of which Paul writes in this passage?
It is the gift of eternal life. Is
this gift given to all men? No, "For
it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this not from yourselves,
it is the gift of God" (Eph. 2:8). Therefore we must understand that when
Paul writes that "the free gift came upon all men", we must understand it in
its context. Verse 18, the immediate context, tells us that those who receive
the gift of righteousness shall reign in life. That is to say, when Paul
writes of all men in verse 19, he is writing of all men who receive the gift.
Those who do not receive the free gift
do not have eternal life.
ROMANS 9:19 AND I TIMOTHY 2:4
"…..for
who resists His will?" (Rom. 9:19)
"This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wills all men to be saved
and to come to a knowledge of the truth" (I Tim.2:4).I
believe that every word in the Bible is inspired by God, the Holy Spirit. So
when the Greek words translated "will(s)" is different in one verse than it
is another, that, in my opinion, is meaningful. The Greek word translated "will"
in Romans 9:19 is "boutomai" and means "intentions". Whereas,
the Greek word translated "wills", in I Tim. 2:4 is "thelo" and means "to wish
or desire".
So in Romans what is implied
by Paul's question is that no one can resist God's intentions. But
in I Timothy Paul says that God desires all men to be saved. What
God desires is not always what He intends to accomplish. In
the case of salvation, He offers it as a gift, but it is clear that that gift
is not accepted by all men, thus His desire, in the case of all men being
saved, is not fulfilled.
ROMANS 11:32
"For
God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them
all". The eleventh chapter of
Romans has been quoted by some in an effort to prove that one can lose his salvation:
it has also been quoted by others in an effort to prove that all men will be
saved. I believe that the exponents of
both doctrines have taken this passage out of context, but I will limit my comments
to the doctrine of universal salvation.
Let us try to determine just what Paul's message
is in Romans 11. Verses 17-18 reads, "If some of the branches have been broken
off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others
and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, do not boast over
those branches". This passage does not
speak of salvation, but of dispensational standing. If we fail to see
that, we are forced to come to the erroneous conclusion that one can
lose their salvation.
Consider the very first verse
of this chapter, "I ask then, Did God reject his people? By
no means!…" Paul is writing of Israel as a nation and their dispensational
standing at the time of the writing of Romans, which was as God's chosen people.
God could not reject His people in terms of salvation. To
read that into this chapter is to do a great disservice to Paul's message.
Consider
verse 22, "Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness
to those who fail, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his
kindness. Otherwise, you also will
be cut off. "Here too, we must understand
that this has nothing to do with salvation, or again, we are forced to the
erroneous conclusion that a child of God can lose his salvation.
Now
that we have seen that Romans 11 has nothing to do with salvation, but with
the dispensational standing of Israel and the nations, let us come to verses
28-32. Paul tells us in verse 30 that the Gentiles have received mercy "as
a result of their (Israel's) disobedience..". What
mercy is he writing about in this passage? Again,
to say that it is the mercy in granting all men salvation is to take this
passage out of its dispensational context. I
believe that the mercy Paul had in mind, is the mercy that God bestowed on
the Gentiles in preaching the gospel to them (verse 30).We
must bare in mind that before Paul, Gentiles were "without God and without
hope in the world" (Eph. 2:12).That
is to say, Gentiles could receive the gift of resurrection life before Paul,
but they had never had the privilege of having been preached to as Gentiles,
before Paul became the "apostle to the uncircumcision".
What was the mercy that God
bestowed on Israel? It was that Gentiles
were being grafted in, in order to make Israel jealous. This
would hopefully, bring all Israel to accepting their risen Messiah.
In short, Israel was disobedient
and God sent His message to the Gentiles in order to provoke Israel to jealousy
(Romans 10:19). In so doing, God showed
mercy to the Gentiles and mercy to Israel. That
mercy is not that He granted the gift of salvation to all, but that He sent
His message to the nations (that was His mercy to the Gentiles) and by so
doing hoped to make Israel jealous (that was His mercy to Israel).
I CORINTHIANS 15:22-23
I
Corinthians 15:22 reads, "So as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be
made alive…". Does this verse say that all
are in Adam and that all are in
Christ? It is obvious that all are in Adam, but are all
in Christ? The answer to that question is found in Romans 16:7, "Salute
Andronicus and Junia......who also were in Christ before me".
It is clear that all men are in Adam by natural birth. But if all men were
in Christ by natural birth then how could Paul be in Christ later than
some? Obviously, he could not. We must conclude therefore, that not
all men are in Christ.
Mr. Knoch teaches that verse
24 refers to "the balance of mankind", in the word "end". "Then cometh
the end when He shall deliver up the kingdom of God". His reasoning
is that the great white throne judgment is at the "end", and that is when
the resurrection of all the unjust of mankind will take place. Therefore,
according to Mr. Knoch, verse 24 speaks of the resurrection of all mankind.
In my opinion, that is reading into scriptures
what is not there. That is to say, verse 24 does not mention resurrection,
it speaks only of what will happen at the end. Also, as I have shown in the
section of this paper on the great white throne, there is not going to be
a resurrection of the unjust of all mankind, therefore I do not agree
that verse 24 teaches the resurrection of "the balance of mankind" as Mr.
Knoch suggests.
The
Bible tells us that Christ rose from the dead after three days and three nights.
The Bible tells us that those in Him
will be raised at His coming. But there
is no mention, (other than the white throne judgment - which is a resurrection
of a very specific group who lived during the very limited time of the tribulation)
of a general resurrection of the unjust anywhere in the Bible, and especially
not in verse 24 of this passage under consideration .
I CORINTHIANS 15:25
"For
He must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. "We must assume
that all existing enemies are meant by the phrase "all his enemies".
The dead, as we have seen in the section above on death, do not exist.
In order for them to exist they must be resurrected. And,
there is no place in the Bible that tells of a general resurrection of all
unbelieving dead from every age, therefore, the dead do not exist.
II CORINTHIANS 5:10
"For
we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive
the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good
or bad". Who is the "all" that must appear
before the judgment seat of Christ? Is
it all mankind? There are two things
in this context which, in my opinion, will show that all believers,
must appear before the judgment seat of Christ.
The
first thing to note is that those who are being judged are being judged according
to what they have done. Unbelievers are not judged (again,
the exception are those who lived through the tribulation and will appear
before the great white throne for judgment) according to what they have done.
Salvation has always been by grace
through faith, as shown in the earlier section of this paper.
The
second thing to note in this passage is that Paul is addressing his remarks
to saved people. Note
verse 5, where we read, "..…God, who also hath given unto us
the earnest of the spirit".Eph. 1:13-14
also speaks of this "earnest"."…..
in whom also after ye believed ye were sealed with that
holy spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance until
the redemption of the purchased possession unto the praise of His glory".
The earnest of our inheritance is that
which guarantees the believer resurrection life. It
is given only to believers, never to unbelievers. This
fact alone is enough scriptural evidence to prove that Paul is addressing
believers. But verse 7 also indicates
that Paul is addressing believers, "For we walk by faith, not by sight".
Therefore, I believe that we may say without
hesitation, that believers will appear before the judgment seat of
Christ. This passage has nothing to do with a judgment of unbeliever, it has
to do with the judgment of believers in terms of rewards..
II CORINTHIANS 5:18-19
"All
this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us
the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself
in Christ, not counting men's sins against them…".As
we have seen in the first section of this paper, God is not counting sins
against anyone. But that does not mean
that all men are saved. Salvation is
a gift that must be accepted, it is not unilateral as is reconciliation.(Please
see the section of this paper, The Difference Between Reconciliation And Salvation.
PHILIPPIANS 2:9-10
"Therefore
God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above
every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and
on earth and under the earth". It
is assumed that only the living are included in this statement that "every
knee shall bow". As we have seen
in the section on death, dead people can not bow the knee. And because there
is no general resurrection of the unbeliever, we may not assume that the
unbelieving dead will rise to bow the knee without scriptural evidence.
COLOSSIANS 1:19-20
"For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood shed on the cross." As we have seen in the first section of this paper, Christ has indeed reconciled all things to Himself through His shed blood, but reconciliation is not at all the same as salvation.
I Timothy 4:9-10
This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation.
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach because we trust in the living
God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe."
What did Paul mean by the phrase. "specially
of those that believe"? Salvation is being resurrected from the dead.
One is either resurrected or not resurrected. Therefore one is either saved
from the grave or not saved from the grave. How can one be especially saved?
I believe that we must consider this passage in its context.
To begin with, this passage is not in the context
of doctrinal teaching. The context is Paul's advice to Timothy on how Timothy
should conduct himself. Therefore, we should not expect to find a doctrine
not otherwise substantiated in Scripture.
Secondly, is Paul's point that God saves all
men? Or could Paul have meant something else when he wrote that God is the
"Saviour of all men"? Given that the phrase "specially of those
that believe" makes no sense if we assume that all men are saved, and
that this phrase comes in the context of Paul giving Timothy advice on how
he should conduct himself, I believe that he meant that indeed God is the
Saviour of all men who believe. This explains the phrase that
follows, "specially of those that believe." God is the Saviour of
all who will be saved because there is no other by Whom any might be saved.
But we do not read anywhere in God's Word that all men will be saved by Him,
because not all men do accept the gift of salvation.
In other words. I believe that Paul is not saying
that all men are saved by God. I believe that what Paul is saying is that
it is by God that all men might be saved, i.e. all men who believe.
But because all men do not believe, and they do not accept the gift of salvation,
not all men are saved.
I
PETER 4:5 AND 17
I
Peter 4:4-5, "They think it strange that you do not plunge with
them into the same flood of dissipation, and they heap abuse on you.
But they will have to give account to him who is ready to judge the living
and the dead". We must ask the question, "Who are the living and the dead that
will be judged? "Note the contrast Peter
makes between "they" and "you". Obviously,
the "they" are unbelievers and the "you" are believers. Are "they" the unbelievers
of every dispensation, i.e. all mankind? If
they are, when are they to be resurrected for judgment? That
is to say, we are not told anywhere in the Bible of a resurrection of the unbelievers
of all mankind, only of those who lived during the tribulation. I
agree with Mr. Knoch's statement quoted in an earlier section, the dead can
not be judged, they must be raised for judgment.
These once dead unbelievers
who must "give account", are those who must answer for what they have done.
I believe that because the only resurrection of unbelievers is at the great
white throne, and that the great white throne judgment is also the only
judgment of deeds of unbelievers, these spoken of by Peter are those who lived
during the tribulation, and did not overcome.
While it is true that there is no mention
of the tribulation in the context, it is also true that Peter's first epistle
was written to Israel. See 2:9, "But
you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging
to God ….".(Compare Ex. 19:5-6).At
the time that Peter wrote his epistles, Israel was looking for the immediate
return of Christ. They expected to live through the time of "Jacob's trouble".
The tribulation was very much in the
minds of all believing Israelites.
I PETER 3:19-20
"…He
was put to death in the body but made alive in the spirit, through which
He also went and preached to the spirits in prison who disobeyed
long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was
being built".Who are the spirits
in prison, to which Peter refers? Are
they all the dead that ever lived?
No, they are those spirits
"who disobeyed God long ago". When?
During the time of Noah. II Peter
2:4 also speaks of these imprisoned spirits that were in the time of Noah."
For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent
them to hell (Greek, tartartoo), putting them into gloomy dungeons to be
held for judgment…". Jude 6 tells us a bit more of these spirits, "And the
angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned
their own home (should be 'bodies') - these He has kept in darkness, bound
with everlasting chains for judgment on the great day".
Let us turn to Genesis
chapter 6 for more information as to who these spirits are that will be
preached to. "The sons of God saw
that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they
chose", (Gen. 6:2).The Hebrew translated
"sons of God" in this verse is always translated "angels" in the Old Testament.
I believe that if we connect all
the New Testament verses with Genesis 6 we can readily see that fallen angels
had taken the daughters of men for their wives. This
was, of course, not what God had intended, and these angels are being imprisoned
in tartartoo for judgment.
Peter tells us that they were preached to.
For the sake of argument let us say
that they may have the opportunity to repent. Even if they do, we can not
say that I Peter 3:19-20 speaks of all mankind, it speaks of fallen angels
who sinned at the time of Noah.
I PETER 4
:6
"For
this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are [now] dead…".There
is no "now" in the manuscripts, but there is nothing in this verse that suggests
that the preaching was being done while they were dead. This
goes against the scriptural definition of death, wherein there is silence.
The gospel was preached to living beings before they died.
SCRIPTURES SUGGESTED BY REV. BILL MC GINNES
The passages quoted above are passages that have been quoted by several
of those who believe in the doctrine of universal salvation. I would like
to be as thorough as possible, and therefore I will comment on the passages
given by Rev. Bill Mc Ginnis on his web-site that are not quoted by others.
THE GREEK USE OF THE DEFINITE ARTICLE
Mark 3:28
"Verily I say unto you, 'All sins shall be forgiven unto the
sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme".
If the sins of all men are forgiven, why does Peter preach in Acts 2:38,
"Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus
Christ for the remission of sins....."?. The answer to our question
lies in the fact that in the Greek language the definite article is often
used to limit the subject. Peter preached that one needed to do something
in order to receive forgiveness of sins. In my opinion that would have been
entirely unnecessary if the sins of all men had already been forgiven. Therefore,
I believe that the definite article in Mark 3:28 limits the noun "men"
to those men who did what Peter preached, i.e. repented.
Ephesians 1:10
"...in the dispensation of the fulness of times He might
gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven
and which are on earth; even in Him". The phrase "all things"
is a translation of the Greek "ta panta". The word "ta"
is the definite article. The clearest use of "ta panta" is found
in Col. 3:8 where we will see that it doesn't mean everything, but that
it limits "all" to the context. Col. 3:8 reads, "But
now ye also put off all these (ta panta); anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy.....".
In this verse the phrase "all these" obviously does not refer
to everything in the universe, but is limited to those things mentioned
in the context. With that in mind, let us return to our consideration of
Eph. 1:10.
In verse 10 we see that "the all things" will be
gathered together ...in Christ". Verses 12-13 explain why "the
all things" are to be gathered together. "That we should be to
the praise of His glory....". Verse 12b and 13 explain who should be
gathered for the purpose of His glory. "who first trusted in God. In
Whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel
of you salvation: in Whom also after ye believed, ye were sealed
with the holy spirit of promise". It is believers who will be gathered
together for the praise of His glory. The unbelieving dead, as we have already
seen in the sections above, cannot be counted among "the all things"
because they will no longer exist.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD'S WILL AND
HIS DESIRE
Matthew 6:10
"Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven".
There are four different Greek words translated
"will" or "wish". The one used in this verse is "thelo".
The Companion Bible definition of "thelo" is, "means to
wish or desire, and is the emotional element which leads to the consequent
action". If the Holy Spirit meant
to say that God wills something in the sense that what He wills will be
accomplished, He would have used the Greek word "boulami". The
Companion Bible definition of that word is, "though it sometimes means
much more, yet has reference to the result of thelo; viz. the deliberate
determination, whether in accordance with or contrary to, the original
wish or impulse". In other words, when God's will is accomplished
the Greek word "boulami"is used. But when something is His desire
but He does not determine it to be accomplished, "thelo" is used.
The Holy Spirit used two different words to express two very different concepts.
If we are to be faithful to His Word, we must take those words seriously.
The prayer, therefore is that what ever God desires will be accomplished
on earth. But God has chosen to give man a free choice and sometimes even
God's desires are not accomplished. His will however, (i.e. as opposed to
His desire) will be accomplished in His time.
I Tim. 2:4
"Who will have all men
to be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth". Here too, the
Greek word used by God, the Holy Spirit is "thelo". The argument
is that if the all-powerful God wills something, it must come to fruition.
While that is certainly true, the problem with that argument is that because
God would like to see all men saved, it does not mean that He will
save all men. Again, because God has given man free will, His desires
are not always accomplished. And again, we must observe the words that the
Holy Spirit uses.
SCRIPTURES TAKEN
OUT OF CONTEXT
Psalm
2:8
"Ask of Me, and I
shall give Thee the heathen for Thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts
of the earth for Thy possession". The Hebrew word translated "heathen"
is "goh" and is sometimes translated "heathen" and some
times translated "nations". The context tells us which the Holy
Spirit had in mind. It is clear from Ps. 2:9 that nations is what
we are to understand. "Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron;
Thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel". This passage
is telling us that Christ will rule the nations with a rod of iron. It is
the nations that He will inherit, it is nations that He will
break and dash, not the individuals. Because nations are not saved
unto eternal life, we must conclude that this passage does not speak of
resurrection life. It speaks of the manner in which Christ will rule the
nations in the millennium.
Ezekiel
33:11
"Say unto them, 'As
I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked;
but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from
your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?" This verse
has to do with death, the end of man's natural life, not with resurrection
life. God is saying that He would rather have man turn from his wicked ways.
It has absolutely nothing to do with resurrection life. To suggest that
because God would like to see man turn from his wicked ways means that He
will save all men unto resurrection life is not supported by this verse,
or any other.
Ezekiel 18:4
"Behold, all souls
are Mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is Mine;
the soul that sinneth, it shall die". Let us determine the point of
this verse by looking at its context.
Verse two of this chapters
reads, "What mean ye that use this proverb.....'The fathers have eaten
sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?". The proverb
seems to suggest that the sons inherit the punishment of what their fathers
do. But the Lord goes on in verses 5-9 to explain that each one is responsible
for his own soul. We read in verse 5, "But if a man be just, and
do that which is lawful and right (verses 6-8 expound on what is lawful
and right) and in verse 9 we read, "Hath walked in My statutes,
and hath kept My judgments, to deal truly: he is just, he shall surely
live, saith the Lord".
Verse 9 tells us who will
live. I believe this refers to living in resurrection. But it is not given
to everyone, it is given to those who walk in His statutes and walk in His
judgments and deals truly.
Coming back to the meaning
of verse 4 where we read that "all souls are Mine". Does that
mean that everyone will be saved? I don't believe that is the point of the
context. The point is that he who lives a just life will live in resurrection,
and he who does not live a just life, will not live in resurrection. In
other words, the point is that if a father does not live a just life, it
does not follow that the son, who may live a just life, will not live in
resurrection. Why? Because each person is God's and will be judged according
to how he has led his life, not on how his father has led it.
A note of clarification
might be helpful here. We read in Ex. 20:5 that the sins of the father will
be "visited" upon the children unto the third and fourth generation".
This verse comes in the context of the old covenant. It had to do with the
promise of earthly blessings if Israel obeyed and earthly
punishments if they disobeyed. We read in Lev. 26:3-13, "If ye walk
in My statutes and keep My commandments, and do them, then I will give you
rain in due season........ I will give you peace in the land....and
ye shall chase your enemies and they shall fall before you.....and
make you fruitful and multiply". In verses 14-39 however, we
read, "But if you will not hearken to Me....I will appoint you terror,
....ye shall sow your seed in vain.....you shall be slain before
your enemies....I will also send wild beasts among you.....I will
bring a sword upon you.......I will make your cities waste......".
It is clear in Lev. 26
that it is earthly, temporal blessings and punishments that are view,
not eternal life. So there is no contradiction between the Lord telling
Israel that He will visit the sins of the fathers upon the sons, and Him
telling Israel that resurrection life will be given to all who are just,
regardless of what their fathers did.
The sins of the father will be punished with earthly, temporal punishments.
But resurrection life is based on the life and faith of each person, regardless
of the lives of their fathers.
Acts 3:19-21
"Repent ye therefore,
and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of
refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; and He shall send
Jesus Christ, Which before was preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive
until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken
by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began".
Note that in verse 12
we learn to whom Peter addressed his remarks, "Ye men of Israel".
Not also that "the times of refreshing" refers to a very specific
period in the history of God's chosen nation, Israel. It refers to the millennial
reign of Christ when all the promises of national blessings will
be fulfilled. How do we know that? The Greek word translated "refreshing"
occurs only once in the New Testament but a related word, translated "restore"
occurs in Acts 1:6, where the disciples asked the Lord if He would at that
time restore the kingdom to Israel. In other words, Acts 3:19-21
is in answer to the question posed in Acts 1:6. Peter was preaching that
the kingdom, i.e. the millennial reign, will be restored when Israel repents
which would have resulted in our Lord's return.
It is clear from such
passages as Ps. 37:9, that
"the times of refreshing" is not a time when all men will
be saved. "For evil men will be cut off, but
those who hope in the Lord will inherit the land". It will be
during the millennium that Israel will inherit the land. But, as this verse
tells us some, i.e. "evil men", will not inherit the land. In
this case the contrast is between inheriting the land and not inheriting
the land. That is to say, that while it is true that the phrase "cut
off" sometimes means to put to death, it is equally true that it sometimes
means to be cut off from one's people. The context will always tell us which
is the way the Holy Spirit intends for us to understand it. In this case
because "cut off" is put in contrast to inheriting the land, it
is clear that some will not inherit the land. That means that evil men who
will be alive at the time of the second coming will live outside the land
of Israel during the millennial reign of Christ. That is why we read in
Psa;m 2, quoted above, that He will rule with a rod of iron and dash the
nations to pieces, etc.
Note also Prov. 2:21-22, “ For the upright will live in
the land, and the blameless will remain in it, but the wicked will be cut
off from the land". And Ps. 37:34 reads, "Wait for the Lord
and keep His way. He will exalt you to possess the land: when the
wicked are cut off, you will see it". Also Ps. 37:22, “Those
the Lord blesses will inherit the land, but those he curses will be cut
off".
As the paper on this web-site The Kingdom
of Heaven will show, only those in the land of Israel for the millennial
reign will have eternal life. May I also remind the reader that unbelieving
Israel will not be raised (see the section in this paper on Old Testament
prophecies about resurrection).
The phrase "times of refreshing" refers to the millennial
reign of Christ at which time not all will be saved.
Ps. 22:27
"All the ends of the world shall remember and turn unto
the Lord: and all the kindreds of the nations shall worship before
Thee". This verse is obviously speaking of the millennial reign of
Christ, and it does seem to be saying that everyone will worship
the Lord. That implies, of course, that everyone will be saved.
But if that were true how are we to understand a statement in
the immediate context? Consider verse 29, ".....and none can keep alive
his own soul". That implies that some will die. We know that there
are no contradictions in the Word of God. How are we therefore, to understand
these two statements?
The NIV has "and all the families of the nations
shall worship", which is a better translation. How does that help us
to clear up this apparent contradiction? It seems obvious to me that the
nations will send representatives to worship at Jerusalem. That is
to say, although Jerusalem will be much larger in the millennium than it
is today, it will not be large enough for every person of every nation
to come to Jerusalem. I believe therefore, that representatives of
"all the families of the nations" will worship, thereby avoiding
the apparent contradiction.
We must also recognize that not all representatives of the nations
outside of Israel will come willingly to worship, as we learn in
Is. 60:12, "For the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will
perish; it will be utterly ruined". Consider also Ps. 2:9, "Thou
shalt break them with a rod of iron; Thou shalt dash them in pieces like
a potter's vessel".
I believe that it is clear that many nations will come unwillingly
to worship God in Jerusalem. They will do so only to avoid the punishment
promised to the nation that does not come.
In order to avoid the apparent contradiction between verses
27 and 29 we must conclude that representatives of each nation will
come to Jerusalem to worship the Lord. But it is clear from the fact that
Christ will rule with a "rod of iron", and that nations are threatened
with ruin if they do not worship, that some living among the nations in
the millennium will be unwilling worshipers, i.e. unbelievers. As
unbelievers, they will be unable to "keep alive his own soul".
The following verses fall into the same argument and I suggest
the same answer: Ps. 72:11, "Yea, all kings shall fall down before
Him; all nations shall serve Him". But verse 9 seems to offer another
picture, "....And His enemies shall lick the dust". That is a
figure of speech Metonymy for "utter subjugation" (Companion Bible).
See also 72:17 and Ps. 86:9.
Isaiah 2:2
"And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain
of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and
shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it".
As mentioned above, it is not every person in every nation that
will come to Jerusalem to worship God. The note in the Companion Bible attests
to that. It reads, "all nations. Figure of speech Synecdoche (of Genus)
=many from all nations". And, as seen in the comments on Ps.
22:27 above, some nations will come only from fear of the ruin promised
if they did not come. In my opinion this shows that not every person is
a willing worshiper. That is to say, some will feign worship,and remain
unbelieving.
Daniel 7:14
"And there was given Him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom,
that all people, nations, and languages, should serve Him; His dominion
is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and His kingdom that
which shall not be destroyed". As the comments on Ps. 22:27 explained,
while it is true that the representatives of all nations will serve Him
and even come to Jerusalem to worship Him, it is also true that they will
not all come willingly. I will quote only one verse from Is. 60 taken from
the comments on Ps. 22, but the reader is encouraged to read all the comments
on that Psalm as it presents the scriptural evidence for my belief that
not all who come to worship Him are actually believers. Is. 60:12, "For
the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be
utterly ruined". Because some come only to avoid the ruin of their
nation,the fact that all will, as Dan. 7:14 tells us, come to serve Him
does not mean that all are believers. If they are not all believers, they
are not all saved.
Isaiah 57:16
"For I will not contend for ever, neither will I
be always wroth: for the spirit should fail before Me, and the souls which
I have made". But the preceding verse explains with whom God will not
contend. Is. 57:15, "For thus saith the high and lofty One That inhabiteth
eternity, whose name is Holy; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him
also that is of a contrite and humble spirit to revive the spirit
of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones". Far from
this passage teaching that all men are saved, it teaches that it is only
the contrite and humble of spirit who will dwell with God. The others will
not, therefore, they will not be saved.
Jeremiah 31:33-34
"Behold, the days come saith the Lord, that I will make
a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day
that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt:
which My covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith
the Lord. But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house
of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put My law in their
inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they
shall be My People. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour
and every man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord': for they shall all know
Me, from the least of them unto the greatest of the, saith the Lord: for
I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more'".
There are two things wrong with the idea that this teaches universal
salvation. 1) The new covenant will be given to "the house of Israel
and the house of Judah". That is to say, it is not made with all of
mankind. 2) As we learned in the section above on Old Testament prophecies
concerning resurrection, the unbeliever of Israel will not be raised.
Therefore, it is clear that the new covenant will be made with the believers
of Israel, and will not include unbelievers of Israel or any
other nation.
Deuteronomy 7:14
"Thou shalt be blessed above all people; there shall not
be male or female barren among you, or among your cattle". The
second part of this verse, "among your cattle", makes it clear
that the blessing spoken of in this verse is not the blessing of eternal
life. That is to say, the barrenness or lack thereof has absolutely nothing
to do with eternal life. Therefore it is earthly, temporal blessings
not salvation that is in view here.
If we look at the preceding verse we will see that this is part
of the old covenant whereby God promised Israel that if they obey, He will
bless them with earthly, temporal blessings, but if they disobey,
He will punish them with earthly punishments (see Lev. 26). Verse
12 reads, "wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these
judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto
thee the covenant and the mercy which He sware unto thy fathers".
Not only is salvation not in the context, but it is also clear
that this was a covenant made with Israel, not with all mankind. That covenant
was that if Israel obeyed the law, God would bless them with earthly
blessings but if they disobeyed, God would punish them with earthly
punishments (see Lev. 26). Therefore, we may conclude that on two counts,
this does not speak of eternal salvation for all mankind.
Micah 7:18
"Who is a God like unto Thee, That pardoneth iniquity,
and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of His heritage:
He retaineth not His anger for ever, because He deilghteth in mercy".The
context will show that this verse has nothing to do with eternal salvation,
it has to do with the attack of Israel by Syria and Babylon which led to
the seventy year captivity of Israel. Note verse 12 and 13, "In that
day also he shall come even to thee from Assyria, and from the fortified
cities, and from the fortress even to the river........Notwithstanding the
land shall be desolate because of them that dwell therein, for the fruit
of their doings".
Verses 16-17 speak of the time when God will forgive Israel
their sins and bring back the remnant of His heritage again to their
own land. "The nations shall see and be confounded at all their (Israel's)
might; they shall lay their hand upon their mouth, their ears shall be deaf.
They shall lick the dust like a serpent, they shall move out of their holes
like worms of the earth, they shall be afraid of the Lord our God, and shall
fear because of Thee". Is it any wonder then that after the great sins
that led Israel into captivity and after the Lord brings the remnant back
to their own land Micah says in verse 18, "Who is a God like unto Thee,
That pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant
of His heritage: He retaineth not His anger for ever, because He delighteth
in mercy".
Acts 10:10-15
I will not quote this entire passage as it is quite well known
by most. Suffice it to say that it is the account of Peter's dream of "a
certain vessel" (verse 11) that was "let down to earth".
Mr. McGinnis uses this passage to say that "all men came down from
heaven" and that "all will be drawn up again into heaven".
To be sure, as we learn in verse 28 where Peter explained what he had learned
from his dream, the beasts of his dream did represent men. "......but
God hath showed me that I should not call any man common or unclean".
So we have Peter having a dream in which he was told by God that he should
call no man unclean. Is that the context in which one may conclude that
all men are saved? I do not believe it is. Let us examine the context so
that we may determine just what the message was that God had for
Peter. Was that message that all men will be saved, or was it that Gentiles
will hear the gospel because God is no respecter of persons?
In verses 23-26 we read that Peter, after his dream, went to
see Cornelius, a Gentile, and Cornelius explained the vision he had while
praying. Peter' s response is recorded in verse 34, "Then Peter opened
his mouth, and said, 'Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter
of persons; but in every nation he that feareth Him, and worketh
righteousness, is accepted with Him'".
Later, Peter gave the following account to the council at Jerusalem
of his experience recorded in Acts 10. So we read in Acts 15:7-9, ".....Peter
rose up, and said unto them, 'Men and brethren ye know how that a good while
ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear
the word of the gospel, and believe. and God Which knoweth the hearts, bare
them witness, giving them the holy ghost, even as He did unto us, and
put no difference between us and them, purifing their hearts by faith".
I believe that the context shows that the point of Peter's
dream was that Peter should call no man unclean and that the Gentiles
should hear the gospel because "God is no respector of persons".
The context does not, in my opinion, allow for the conclusion suggested
by Mr. Mc Ginnis, that Peter's dream meant that all men will ascend into
heaven.
John 17:2
"As Thou hast given Him power over all flesh, that He
should give eternal life to as many as Thou hast given Him".
Let us consider the phrase, "as many as Thou hast given Him".
Did God give all men to Christ to be saved? The answer to that question
is found in verse 9, "I pray for them ("the men which Thou hast
given Me"- verse 6), I pray not for the world, but for them
which Thou has given Me, for they are Thine". If all men had been given
to Christ then the contrast could not have been made between those whom
God had given and "the world". Therefore, we must conclude that
not all men were given to Christ for salvation.
Hebrews 2:9
"........that He, by the grace of God should taste death
for every man". The argument is that because He tasted death for all
men, that all men would be made alive. The problem with that argument lies
in the fact that it contradicts the following verse.
Verse 10, tells us for whom He died, "For it became Him......in
bringing many sons unto glory to make the Captain of their salvation
perfect through suffering....". Verse 9 tells us that He died on behalf
of every man, but verse 10 tells us that He brought "many sons"
to glory. There are, of course, no contradiction in the Word of God. Therefore
we must conclude that while it is true He died on behalf of everyone, many,
not all, will be brought to glory.
I John 5:11
"And this is the record, that God hath given to us
eternal life, and this life is in His Son". Who does John mean by "us"
in this verse? Is it all mankind? The only way to answer that question is
by determining to whom this epistle was written.
I Jn. 2:21, "I have not written unto you because ye know
not the truth, but because ye know it....". In other words,
John wrote to those who knew the truth, i.e. to believers.
I Jn. 2:27, "But the anointing which ye have received
of Him abideth in you and ye need not that any man teach you; but as the
same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth and is no
lie, and even as it hath taught you ye shall abide in Him".
Unbelievers do not abide in Him (see note above on I Cor. 15:22). Unbelievers
do not receive the truth, that's what makes them unbelievers.
I Jn. 3:1, "Behold what manner of love the Father hath
bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God; therefore the
world knoweth us not, because it knew Him not". Note the contrast between
the world, who does not know Him, and "us" who do know Him, and
are His children. May I remind the reader that not all men are children
of God, but only believers are God's children. . As we read in Jn.
1:12, "But as many as received Him, to them gave He power
to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name".
(See also the section below, "Is God The Father Of All Men?")
Obviously, if there is a contrast between the world and others, not all
men are in the same class as believers. That is to say, some are in the
world and do not know Him, and others are not in the world and do know Him.
Let us continue our search of this epistle in order to discover
to whom it was written, thereby determining who the "us" is (I
Jn. 5:11) that has been given eternal life. We read in I Jn. 4:45"Ye
are of God, little children, and have overcome them (evil spirits-verse
3)...... They are of the world; therefore speak they of the world,
and world heareth them". Again the contrast is made between "ye"
of verse 4 and "they" of verse 5, Verse 6 continues the contrast,
"We are of God; he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is
not of God heareth not us". If every man were "of God"
then there could be no contrast between those that are of God and those
who are not. We must conclude therefore, that John wrote this epistle
to believers